Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel G3900T

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel G3900T

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel G3900T

Reasons to consider the
Intel G3900T

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,510 vs 470 Around 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.6 GHz vs 1.75 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark score 2,944 vs 1,674 More than 75% better PassMark score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Oct, 2015 vs Jan, 2015 Release date 9 months later
Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 28.44W 5.8x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 10.68 pt/W vs 4.14 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 5.8x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 5.8x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of G3900T vs Celeron N3150

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

G3900T
2,944

PassMark (Single Core)

G3900T
1,510

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

G3900T  vs
Celeron N3150 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 6W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 5.26 $/year
Performance per watt 4.14 pt/W 10.68 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 4.88W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

G3900T  vs
Celeron N3150 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.6 GHz 1.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.6 GHz 1.75 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 510 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 320 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 8,192 MB
Intel G3900T
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3150
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus