Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel G3900E

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel G3900E

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel G3900E

Reasons to consider the
Intel G3900E

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz 60% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,405 vs 818 More than 70% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better performance per dollar 1.25 pt/$ vs 0.99 pt/$ More than 25% better performance per dollar
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jan, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Better PassMark score 2,707 vs 1,399 Around 95% better PassMark score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 1007U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1007U

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 28.44W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 950 MHz More than 5% better turbo clock speed
Lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of G3900E vs Celeron 1007U

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

G3900E
2,707

PassMark (Single Core)

G3900E
1,405

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

G3900E  vs
Celeron 1007U 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 17W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 3.83 pt/W 4.38 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 13.81W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

G3900E  vs
Celeron 1007U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L3 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 1.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 510 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 950 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 32,768 MB
Intel G3900E
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1007U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus