Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel G3900E

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel G3900E

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel G3900E

Reasons to consider the
Intel G3900E

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,405 vs 448 Around 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better performance per dollar 1.25 pt/$ vs 0.75 pt/$ Around 70% better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark score 2,707 vs 961 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jul, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom C2358

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2358

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 5.69W vs 28.44W 5x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 6.4 pt/W vs 3.83 pt/W More than 65% better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 1.69 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 6.13 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 5x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of G3900E vs Atom C2358

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

G3900E
2,707

PassMark (Single Core)

G3900E
1,405

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

G3900E  vs
Atom C2358 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 35W 7W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 1.69 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 6.13 $/year
Performance per watt 3.83 pt/W 6.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 5.69W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

G3900E  vs
Atom C2358 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 1.7 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 510 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 950 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 16,384 MB
Intel G3900E
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2358
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus