0 Comments
| Intel G3900 vs AMD A4 6300 |
Released October, 2015
Intel G3900
- 2.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel G3900
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Slightly more l3 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 41.44W | ![]() | Newer Oct, 2015 |
VS
Released July, 2013
AMD A4 6300
- 3.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD A4 6300
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.7 GHz | ![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 760 MHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slightly more l3 cache | 2 MB | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 41.44W | vs | 52.81W | More than 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 12.29 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 20% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 44.68 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher GPU clock speed | 760 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed |
Features Key features of the G3900 vs A4 6300
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | G3900 | vs | A4 6300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
BMI1 | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
ABM | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1333 |
details | G3900 | vs | A4 6300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L3 cache | 2 MB | None | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | Radeon™ HD 8370D | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 760 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 51W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 12.29 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 44.68 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 41.44W | 52.81W |
Intel G3900 ![]() | AMD A4 6300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
6300 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$62 | ||
6300 vs 6400K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | ||
A4 6300 vs FX 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$62 | ||
6300 vs 7400K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | ||
6300 vs 5400K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$45 | ||
6300 vs 7300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $63 | |
G3900 vs G4400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||