0 Comments
| Intel E7-4809V4 vs E5-4655V4 |
Released April, 2016
Intel E7-4809V4
- 2.1 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel E7-4809V4
![]() | Supports more RAM 3,145,728 MB | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 93.44W |
![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year |
VS
Released April, 2016
Intel E5-4655V4
- 2.5 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E5-4655V4
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.5 GHz |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more RAM | 3,145,728 MB | vs | 1,572,864 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower typical power consumption | 93.44W | vs | 109.69W | Around 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | vs | 32.52 $/year | Around 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | vs | 118.26 $/year | Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the E7-4809V4 vs E5-4655V4
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E7-4809V4 | vs | E5-4655V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
AVX | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 115W | 135W | |
Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 32.52 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 118.26 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 109.69W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 3 | 2 | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s |
details | E7-4809V4 | vs | E5-4655V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 16 | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 4 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum memory size | 3,145,728 MB | 1,572,864 MB |
Intel E7-4809V4 ![]() | Intel E5-4655V4 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$417 | ||
E5-2620V4 vs E7-4809V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs E7-4809V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,223 | ||
E7-4809 v3 vs E7-4809V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,446 | ||
E7-4820 vs E7-4809V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,223 | ||
E7-4809 v2 vs E7-4809V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$581 | ||
D-1540 vs E5-4655V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
E5-4627V4 vs E5-4655V4 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||