CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-4669V4 vs E5-2699V4 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel E5-2699V4 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel E5-2699V4  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel E5-2699V4

Intel E5-2699V4

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel E5-4669V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-4669V4

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 2 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Lower typical power consumption 109.69W vs 117.81W More than 5% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 32.52 $/year vs 34.93 $/year More than 5% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year vs 127.02 $/year More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Apr, 2016 vs Jan, 2016 Release date 3 months later
Front view of Intel E5-2699V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-2699V4

Report a correction
Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 20% higher turbo clock speed
Much better PassMark score 23,362 vs 13,626 More than 70% better PassMark score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,766 vs 1,250 More than 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better performance per watt 6.25 pt/W vs 2.58 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.56 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.83 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-4669V4 vs E5-2699V4

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E5-4669V4
13,626
E5-2699V4
23,362

PassMark (Single Core)

E5-4669V4
1,250
E5-2699V4
1,766

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E5-4669V4  vs
E5-2699V4 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Processing Cores Processing Cores

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
AVX
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 135W 145W
Annual home energy cost 32.52 $/year 34.93 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year 127.02 $/year
Performance per watt 2.58 pt/W 6.25 pt/W
Typical power consumption 109.69W 117.81W

bus

Architecture FSB QPI
Number of links 2 2
Transfer rate 9,600 MT/s 9,600 MT/s

details

E5-4669V4  vs
E5-2699V4 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 44 44
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 4 2

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.56 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 2.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.2 GHz 2.56 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum memory size 1,572,864 MB 1,572,864 MB
Intel E5-4669V4
Report a correction
Intel E5-2699V4
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus