Intel E5-4628LV4 vs Core i5 6200U |
Released April, 2016
Intel E5-4628LV4
- 1.8 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-4628LV4
 | More cores 14 | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 |
| | More threads 28 | | Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6200U
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i5 6200U
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Higher turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz |
| | Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz | | Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More cores | 14 | vs | 2 | 12 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| More threads | 28 | vs | 4 | 24 more threads | |||
| Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 48x more RAM | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2015 | Release date 9 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 60.94W | 5x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 18.07 $/year | 5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 65.7 $/year | 5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the E5-4628LV4 vs Core i5 6200U
clock speed
turbo clock speed
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-4628LV4 | vs | Core i5 6200U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Processing Cores | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Channels | Quad Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | E5-4628LV4 | vs | Core i5 6200U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 28 | 4 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 4 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 520 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 300 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,000 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 75W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 18.07 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 65.7 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 60.94W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 4,000 MT/s | |
 Intel E5-4628LV4  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 6200U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
