Winner
Intel E5-2690V4
CPUBoss recommends the Intel E5-2690V4 based on its single-core performance and value.
See full details Intel E5-2699V4 vs E5-2690V4 |
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2699V4
- 2.2 GHz
- Processing Cores
5.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-2699V4
 | Much more l3 cache 55 MB | | More cores 22 |
| | More threads 44 | | Better PassMark score 23,362 |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2690V4
- 2.6 GHz
- Processing Cores
5.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E5-2690V4
| | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.32 GHz |
| | Lower typical power consumption 109.69W | | Higher Maximum operating temperature 89 °C |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2699V4 vs E5-2690V4 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel E5-2690V4CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 55 MB | vs | 35 MB | More than 55% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More cores | 22 | vs | 14 | 8 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 44 | vs | 28 | 16 more threads | |||
| Better PassMark score | 23,362 | vs | 21,801 | More than 5% better PassMark score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 6.25 pt/W | vs | 5.06 pt/W | Around 25% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.32 GHz | vs | 2.56 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 109.69W | vs | 117.81W | More than 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 89 °C | vs | 79 °C | Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 0.33 pt/$ | vs | 0.22 pt/$ | Around 50% better performance per dollar | |||
| Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,917 | vs | 1,766 | Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | vs | 34.93 $/year | More than 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | vs | 127.02 $/year | More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.17 GHz | vs | 2.83 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2699V4 vs E5-2690V4
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-2699V4 | vs | E5-2690V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Processing Cores | Processing Cores | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 145W | 135W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 34.93 $/year | 32.52 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 127.02 $/year | 118.26 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 6.25 pt/W | 5.06 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 117.81W | 109.69W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz | |
details | E5-2699V4 | vs | E5-2690V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 44 | 28 | |
| L3 cache | 55 MB | 35 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 79°C | Unknown - 89°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.56 GHz | 3.32 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.83 GHz | 3.17 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.56 GHz | 3.32 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 1,572,864 MB | |
 Intel E5-2699V4  Report a correction |  Intel E5-2690V4 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $2,300 | $2,090 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs E5-2690V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,086 | $2,090 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2690 vs E5-2690V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,806 | $2,090 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs E5-2690V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,032 | $2,090 | |
| Intel Xeon E5 2690 v2 vs E5-2690V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $586 | $2,090 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs E5-2690V4 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $4,115 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2699V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $4,115 | ||
| Intel 6950X vs E5-2699V4 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
