0 Comments
| Intel E5-2699V4 vs E5-2690V4 |
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2699V4
- 2.2 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-2699V4
![]() | Much more l3 cache 55 MB | ![]() | More cores 22 |
![]() | More threads 44 | ![]() | Better PassMark score 23,362 |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2690V4
- 2.6 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the E5-2690V4
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.32 GHz |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 109.69W | ![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 89 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel E5-2690V4CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 55 MB | vs | 35 MB | More than 55% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 22 | vs | 14 | 8 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 44 | vs | 28 | 16 more threads | |||
Better PassMark score | 23,362 | vs | 21,801 | More than 5% better PassMark score | |||
Better performance per watt | 6.25 pt/W | vs | 5.06 pt/W | Around 25% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.32 GHz | vs | 2.56 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 109.69W | vs | 117.81W | More than 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 89 °C | vs | 79 °C | Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better performance per dollar | 0.33 pt/$ | vs | 0.22 pt/$ | Around 50% better performance per dollar | |||
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,917 | vs | 1,766 | Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | vs | 34.93 $/year | More than 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | vs | 127.02 $/year | More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.17 GHz | vs | 2.83 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2699V4 vs E5-2690V4
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-2699V4 | vs | E5-2690V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Processing Cores | Processing Cores | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 145W | 135W | |
Annual home energy cost | 34.93 $/year | 32.52 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 127.02 $/year | 118.26 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6.25 pt/W | 5.06 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 117.81W | 109.69W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
details | E5-2699V4 | vs | E5-2690V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 44 | 28 | |
L3 cache | 55 MB | 35 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 79°C | Unknown - 89°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.56 GHz | 3.32 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.83 GHz | 3.17 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.56 GHz | 3.32 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 1,572,864 MB |
Intel E5-2699V4 ![]() | Intel E5-2690V4 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$4,115 | $4,115 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2699V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $4,115 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs E5-2699V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,300 | $2,090 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs E5-2690V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,086 | $2,090 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 vs E5-2690V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,913 | $2,090 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2687W vs E5-2690V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,417 | $2,090 | |
Intel Xeon X5675 vs E5-2690V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$4,115 | $2,090 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2690V4 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||