Winner
Intel E5-2680V4
CPUBoss recommends the Intel E5-2680V4 based on its power consumption.
See full details | Intel E5-2699V4 vs E5-2680V4 |
![]() | Much more l3 cache 55 MB | ![]() | More cores 22 |
![]() | More threads 44 | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 97.5W |
![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 86 °C | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.82 GHz |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
6.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 55 MB | vs | 35 MB | More than 55% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 22 | vs | 14 | 8 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 44 | vs | 28 | 16 more threads | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 4,740 MB/s | vs | 3,370 MB/s | More than 40% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Better PassMark score | 23,362 | vs | 19,922 | More than 15% better PassMark score | |||
Significantly better performance per watt | 6.25 pt/W | vs | 2.89 pt/W | Around 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.83 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 97.5W | vs | 117.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 86 °C | vs | 79 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.82 GHz | vs | 2.56 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 28.91 $/year | vs | 34.93 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 105.12 $/year | vs | 127.02 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | E5-2699V4 | vs | E5-2680V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Cores | Processing Cores | Single core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 145W | 120W | |
Annual home energy cost | 34.93 $/year | 28.91 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 127.02 $/year | 105.12 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6.25 pt/W | 2.89 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 117.81W | 97.5W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
details | E5-2699V4 | vs | E5-2680V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 44 | 28 | |
L3 cache | 55 MB | 35 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 79°C | Unknown - 86°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.56 GHz | 2.82 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.83 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.56 GHz | 2.82 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 1,572,864 MB |
Intel E5-2699V4 ![]() | Intel E5-2680V4 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,745 | $1,900 | |
Intel E5-2680V4 vs Xeon E5-2680 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,745 | $2,090 | |
Intel E5-2680V4 vs E5-2690V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,745 | $350 | |
Intel E5-2680V4 vs Core i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,745 | $262 | |
Intel E5-2680V4 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,745 | $2,300 | |
Intel E5-2680V4 vs Xeon E5-2690 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$4,115 | ||
Intel E5-2699V4 vs E5-2699AV4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$4,115 | $4,115 | |
Intel E5-2699V4 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||