Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel E5-2699V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-2699V4

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 55 MB vs 15 MB Around 3.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 22 vs 6 16 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 44 vs 12 32 more threads
Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB vs 65,536 MB Supports 24x more RAM
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark score 23,362 vs 13,647 More than 70% better PassMark score
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jul, 2014 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Core i7 5930K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 5930K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 2.75 pt/$ vs 0.22 pt/$ Around 12.5x better performance per dollar
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.77 GHz vs 2.56 GHz More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better performance per watt 11.39 pt/W vs 6.25 pt/W More than 80% better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,095 vs 1,766 Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Slightly lower typical power consumption 113.75W vs 117.81W Around 5% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.45 GHz vs 2.83 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 33.73 $/year vs 34.93 $/year Around 5% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 122.64 $/year vs 127.02 $/year Around 5% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2699V4 vs Core i7 5930K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-2699V4
103,800
Core i7 5930K
20,902

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-2699V4
3,842

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-2699V4
4,740 MB/s
Core i7 5930K
4,300,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E5-2699V4
23,362
Core i7 5930K
13,647

PassMark (Single Core)

E5-2699V4
1,766

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E5-2699V4  vs
Core i7 5930K 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cores Processing Cores Hexa core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 145W 140W
Annual home energy cost 34.93 $/year 33.73 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 127.02 $/year 122.64 $/year
Performance per watt 6.25 pt/W 11.39 pt/W
Typical power consumption 117.81W 113.75W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 0
Transfer rate 9,600 MT/s 0 MT/s
Clock speed 4,800 MHz 0 MHz

details

E5-2699V4  vs
Core i7 5930K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 44 12
L3 cache 55 MB 15 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.56 GHz 4.77 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.83 GHz 4.45 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.56 GHz 4.77 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum memory size 1,572,864 MB 65,536 MB
Intel E5-2699V4
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 5930K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus