CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2699V4 vs 4770K among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel E5-2699V4 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel E5-2699V4  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel E5-2699V4

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel E5-2699V4

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel E5-2699V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-2699V4

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 55 MB vs 8 MB Around 7x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 22 vs 4 18 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 44 vs 8 36 more threads
Much better PassMark score 23,362 vs 10,016 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB vs 32,768 MB Supports 48x more RAM
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jun, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Higher Maximum operating temperature 79 °C vs 72.72 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 3.83 pt/$ vs 0.22 pt/$ Around 17.5x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 68.25W vs 117.81W More than 40% lower typical power consumption
Higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz vs 2.56 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better performance per watt 11.31 pt/W vs 6.25 pt/W More than 80% better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,165 vs 1,766 Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much lower annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year vs 34.93 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year vs 127.02 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz vs 2.83 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2699V4 vs Core i7 4770K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-2699V4
103,800
Core i7 4770K
14,184

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-2699V4
3,842

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-2699V4
4,740 MB/s
Core i7 4770K
4,810,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E5-2699V4
23,362
Core i7 4770K
10,016

PassMark (Single Core)

E5-2699V4
1,766

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E5-2699V4  vs
Core i7 4770K 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Processing Cores Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 145W 84W
Annual home energy cost 34.93 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 127.02 $/year 73.58 $/year
Performance per watt 6.25 pt/W 11.31 pt/W
Typical power consumption 117.81W 68.25W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI 2.0
Number of links 2 0
Transfer rate 9,600 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

E5-2699V4  vs
Core i7 4770K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 44 8
L3 cache 55 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 79°C Unknown - 72.72°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.56 GHz 4.48 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.83 GHz 4.55 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.56 GHz 4.48 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,250 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum memory size 1,572,864 MB 32,768 MB
Intel E5-2699V4
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4770K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus