0 Comments
| Intel E5-2699V4 vs 6950X |
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2699V4
- 2.2 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-2699V4
![]() | More cores 22 | ![]() | More threads 44 |
![]() | Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released April, 2016
Intel 6950X
- 3 GHz
- Deca core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the 6950X
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.22 GHz |
![]() | Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,143 | ![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 113.75W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
More cores | 22 | vs | 10 | 12 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 44 | vs | 20 | 24 more threads | |||
Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 131,072 MB | Supports 12x more RAM | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Better PassMark score | 23,362 | vs | 20,013 | More than 15% better PassMark score | |||
Better performance per watt | 6.25 pt/W | vs | 3.64 pt/W | More than 70% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.22 GHz | vs | 2.56 GHz | Around 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,143 | vs | 1,766 | More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 113.75W | vs | 117.81W | Around 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.3 GHz | vs | 2.83 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Apr, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2016 | Release date 3 months later | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 33.73 $/year | vs | 34.93 $/year | Around 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 122.64 $/year | vs | 127.02 $/year | Around 5% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2699V4 vs 6950X
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-2699V4 | vs | 6950X |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Processing Cores | Deca core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 145W | 140W | |
Annual home energy cost | 34.93 $/year | 33.73 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 127.02 $/year | 122.64 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6.25 pt/W | 3.64 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 117.81W | 113.75W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | FSB | |
Number of links | 2 | 1 |
details | E5-2699V4 | vs | 6950X |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 44 | 20 | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.56 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.83 GHz | 4.3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.56 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 131,072 MB |
Intel E5-2699V4 ![]() | Intel 6950X ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$4,115 | $4,115 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2699V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,745 | $4,115 | |
Intel E5-2680V4 vs E5-2699V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 6950X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,016 | ||
Intel Core i7 5960X vs 6950X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel 6900K vs 6950X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | ||
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6950X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel 6850K vs 6950X | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||