0 Comments
| Intel E5-2698V4 vs E5-2697AV4 |
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2698V4
- 2.2 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-2698V4
![]() | Significantly more l3 cache 50 MB | ![]() | More cores 20 |
![]() | More threads 40 | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 109.69W |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2697AV4
- 2.6 GHz
- 16 core
Reasons to buy the E5-2697AV4
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly more l3 cache | 50 MB | vs | 40 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 20 | vs | 16 | 4 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 40 | vs | 32 | 8 more threads | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 109.69W | vs | 117.81W | More than 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 78 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | vs | 34.93 $/year | More than 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | vs | 127.02 $/year | More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed |
Features Key features of the E5-2698V4 vs E5-2697AV4
clock speed
E5-2698V4
2.2 GHz
E5-2697AV4
2.6 GHz
turbo clock speed
E5-2698V4
3.6 GHz
E5-2697AV4
3.6 GHz
L3 cache
E5-2698V4
50 MB
E5-2697AV4
40 MB
TDP
E5-2698V4
135W
E5-2697AV4
145W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-2698V4 | vs | E5-2697AV4 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Cores | Processing Cores | 16 core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 1,572,864 MB |
details | E5-2698V4 | vs | E5-2697AV4 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 40 | 32 | |
L3 cache | 50 MB | 40 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 90°C | Unknown - 78°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 135W | 145W | |
Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 34.93 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 127.02 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 117.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
Intel E5-2698V4 ![]() | Intel E5-2697AV4 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,226 | $4,115 | |
E5-2698V4 vs E5-2699V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,226 | $531 | |
E5-2698V4 vs E5-2623 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,226 | $4,115 | |
E5-2698V4 vs E5-2699 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,226 | $3,900 | |
E5-2698V4 vs E5-4650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,226 | $3,226 | |
E5-2698V4 vs E5-2698 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,891 | $2,702 | |
E5-2697AV4 vs E5-2697V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,891 | $2,032 | |
E5-2697AV4 vs 2690 v2 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||