Winner
Intel Core i7 5820K
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 5820K based on its single-core performance and value.
See full details Intel E5-2698V4 vs Core i7 5820K |
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2698V4
- 2.2 GHz
- Processing Cores
5.8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-2698V4
 | Much more l3 cache 50 MB | | More cores 20 |
| | More threads 40 | | Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Core i7 5820K
- 3.3 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
5.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i7 5820K
| | Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | | Much better performance per dollar 3.87 pt/$ |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.34 GHz | | Much better performance per watt 10.79 pt/W |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2698V4 vs 5820K among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 50 MB | vs | 15 MB | More than 3.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More cores | 20 | vs | 6 | 14 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 40 | vs | 12 | 28 more threads | |||
| Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 65,536 MB | Supports 24x more RAM | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better PassMark score | 21,789 | vs | 12,995 | Around 70% better PassMark score | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Slightly lower typical power consumption | 109.69W | vs | 113.75W | Around 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | vs | 33.73 $/year | Around 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | vs | 122.64 $/year | Around 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 3.87 pt/$ | vs | 0.14 pt/$ | Around 27.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.34 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 10.79 pt/W | vs | 3.4 pt/W | Around 3.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,017 | vs | 1,584 | More than 25% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.51 GHz | vs | 2.37 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2698V4 vs Core i7 5820K
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-2698V4 | vs | Core i7 5820K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Processing Cores | Hexa core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 135W | 140W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 33.73 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 122.64 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.4 pt/W | 10.79 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 113.75W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 0 | |
| Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 0 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 0 MHz | |
details | E5-2698V4 | vs | Core i7 5820K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 40 | 12 | |
| L3 cache | 50 MB | 15 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.34 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.37 GHz | 4.51 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.2 GHz | 4.34 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 65,536 MB | |
 Intel E5-2698V4  Report a correction |  Intel Core i7 5820K Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $390 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 5820K | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $390 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 5820K | ||
 | VS | |
| $580 | $390 | |
| Intel Core i7 5930K vs 5820K | ||
 | VS | |
| $435 | $390 | |
| Intel Core i7 4930K vs 5820K | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,016 | $390 | |
| Intel Core i7 5960X vs 5820K | ||
 | VS | |
| $262 | $390 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs Core i7 5820K | ||
 | VS | |
| $390 | ||
| Intel 6800K vs Core i7 5820K | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
