CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2698V4 vs 5820K among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
E5-2698V4
8.1
Core i7 5820K
6.8
Core i7 6700K
6.5
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
E5-2698V4
6.7
Core i7 5820K
9.0
Core i7 6700K
8.0
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
E5-2698V4
0.0
Core i7 5820K
0.0
Core i7 6700K
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
E5-2698V4
0.0
Core i7 5820K
0.0
Core i7 6700K
8.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
E5-2698V4
5.0
Core i7 5820K
5.0
Core i7 6700K
5.2
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
E5-2698V4
n.d.
Core i7 5820K
5.0
Core i7 6700K
5.8
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel E5-2698V4

Front view of Intel E5-2698V4
Front view of Intel Core i7 5820K

Intel Core i7 5820K

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel E5-2698V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-2698V4

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 50 MB vs 15 MB More than 3.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 20 vs 6 14 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 40 vs 12 28 more threads
Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB vs 65,536 MB Supports 24x more RAM
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark score 21,789 vs 12,995 Around 70% better PassMark score
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Slightly lower typical power consumption 109.69W vs 113.75W Around 5% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jul, 2014 Release date over 1 years later
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 32.52 $/year vs 33.73 $/year Around 5% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year vs 122.64 $/year Around 5% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 5820K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 5820K

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 3.87 pt/$ vs 0.14 pt/$ Around 27.2x better performance per dollar
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.34 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better performance per watt 10.79 pt/W vs 3.4 pt/W Around 3.2x better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,017 vs 1,584 More than 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.51 GHz vs 2.37 GHz More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2698V4 vs Core i7 5820K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-2698V4
34,607.5
Core i7 5820K
19,546

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-2698V4
2,672
Core i7 5820K
3,412

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-2698V4
3,415 MB/s
Core i7 5820K
4,050,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E5-2698V4
21,789
Core i7 5820K
12,995

PassMark (Single Core)

E5-2698V4
1,584
Core i7 5820K
2,017

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 E5-2698V4  vs
Core i7 5820K 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 3.3 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Processing Cores Hexa core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 135W 140W
Annual home energy cost 32.52 $/year 33.73 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year 122.64 $/year
Performance per watt 3.4 pt/W 10.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 109.69W 113.75W

bus
Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 0
Transfer rate 9,600 MT/s 0 MT/s
Clock speed 4,800 MHz 0 MHz

details

 E5-2698V4  vs
Core i7 5820K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 40 12
L3 cache 50 MB 15 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.2 GHz 4.34 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.37 GHz 4.51 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.2 GHz 4.34 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum memory size 1,572,864 MB 65,536 MB
Intel E5-2698V4
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 5820K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss