0 Comments
| Intel E5-2698V4 vs Core i7 5820K |
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2698V4
- 2.2 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-2698V4
![]() | Much more l3 cache 50 MB | ![]() | More cores 20 |
![]() | More threads 40 | ![]() | Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Core i7 5820K
- 3.3 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 5820K
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 3.87 pt/$ |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.34 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 10.79 pt/W |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2698V4 vs 5820K among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 50 MB | vs | 15 MB | More than 3.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 20 | vs | 6 | 14 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 40 | vs | 12 | 28 more threads | |||
Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 65,536 MB | Supports 24x more RAM | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better PassMark score | 21,789 | vs | 12,995 | Around 70% better PassMark score | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 109.69W | vs | 113.75W | Around 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | vs | 33.73 $/year | Around 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | vs | 122.64 $/year | Around 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 3.87 pt/$ | vs | 0.14 pt/$ | Around 27.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.34 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better performance per watt | 10.79 pt/W | vs | 3.4 pt/W | Around 3.2x better performance per watt | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,017 | vs | 1,584 | More than 25% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.51 GHz | vs | 2.37 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2698V4 vs Core i7 5820K
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
E5-2698V4
34,607.5
Core i7 5820K
19,546
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
E5-2698V4
2,672
Core i7 5820K
3,412
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
E5-2698V4
3,415 MB/s
Core i7 5820K
4,050,000 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
E5-2698V4
21,789
Core i7 5820K
12,995
PassMark (Single Core)
E5-2698V4
1,584
Core i7 5820K
2,017
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-2698V4 | vs | Core i7 5820K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Cores | Processing Cores | Hexa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 135W | 140W | |
Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 33.73 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 122.64 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.4 pt/W | 10.79 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 113.75W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 0 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 0 MHz |
details | E5-2698V4 | vs | Core i7 5820K |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 40 | 12 | |
L3 cache | 50 MB | 15 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.34 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.37 GHz | 4.51 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.2 GHz | 4.34 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 65,536 MB |
Intel E5-2698V4 ![]() | Intel Core i7 5820K ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $390 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 5820K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $390 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 5820K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$580 | $390 | |
Intel Core i7 5930K vs 5820K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,016 | $390 | |
Intel Core i7 5960X vs 5820K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$435 | $390 | |
Intel Core i7 4930K vs 5820K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$390 | ||
Intel 6800K vs Core i7 5820K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $390 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs 5820K | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||