Intel E5-2667V4 vs E5-2620V4 |
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2667V4
- 3.2 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-2667V4
 | Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | | Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz |
| | More l3 cache 25 MB | | Significantly better PassMark score 16,389 |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2620V4
- 2.1 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the E5-2620V4
| | Much lower typical power consumption 69.06W | | Significantly better performance per dollar 0.52 pt/$ |
| | Much lower annual home energy cost 20.48 $/year | | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 74.46 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | More than 50% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More l3 cache | 25 MB | vs | 20 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 16,389 | vs | 11,389 | Around 45% better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.37 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly more l3 cache per core | 3.13 MB/core | vs | 2.5 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,882 | vs | 1,527 | Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 3.45 pt/W | vs | 2.54 pt/W | More than 35% better performance per watt | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 78 °C | vs | 74 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.58 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 69.06W | vs | 109.69W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly better performance per dollar | 0.52 pt/$ | vs | 0.23 pt/$ | More than 2.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.48 $/year | vs | 32.52 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 74.46 $/year | vs | 118.26 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2667V4 vs E5-2620V4
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-2667V4 | vs | E5-2620V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 135W | 85W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 20.48 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 74.46 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.45 pt/W | 2.54 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 69.06W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,000 MHz | |
details | E5-2667V4 | vs | E5-2620V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 16 | 16 | |
| L3 cache | 25 MB | 20 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 3.13 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 78°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.37 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | 2.37 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 1,572,864 MB | |
 Intel E5-2667V4  Report a correction |  Intel E5-2620V4 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $262 | $417 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $681 | $417 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $667 | $417 | |
| Intel E5-2630V4 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $310 | $417 | |
| Intel E5-2609V4 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,900 | $417 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $440 | $417 | |
| Intel Xeon E5 2620 v2 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $2,057 | $2,057 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs E5-2667V4 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
