0 Comments
| Intel E5-2667V4 vs E5-2620V4 |
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2667V4
- 3.2 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-2667V4
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz |
![]() | More l3 cache 25 MB | ![]() | Significantly better PassMark score 16,389 |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2620V4
- 2.1 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the E5-2620V4
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 69.06W | ![]() | Significantly better performance per dollar 0.52 pt/$ |
![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 20.48 $/year | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 74.46 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | More than 50% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
More l3 cache | 25 MB | vs | 20 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 16,389 | vs | 11,389 | Around 45% better PassMark score | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.37 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly more l3 cache per core | 3.13 MB/core | vs | 2.5 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,882 | vs | 1,527 | Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better performance per watt | 3.45 pt/W | vs | 2.54 pt/W | More than 35% better performance per watt | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 78 °C | vs | 74 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.58 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 69.06W | vs | 109.69W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly better performance per dollar | 0.52 pt/$ | vs | 0.23 pt/$ | More than 2.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.48 $/year | vs | 32.52 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 74.46 $/year | vs | 118.26 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2667V4 vs E5-2620V4
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-2667V4 | vs | E5-2620V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 135W | 85W | |
Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 20.48 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 74.46 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.45 pt/W | 2.54 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 69.06W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
details | E5-2667V4 | vs | E5-2620V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 16 | |
L3 cache | 25 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 3.13 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 78°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.37 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | 2.37 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 1,572,864 MB |
Intel E5-2667V4 ![]() | Intel E5-2620V4 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | $417 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$681 | $417 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$667 | $417 | |
Intel E5-2630V4 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$310 | $417 | |
Intel E5-2609V4 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,900 | $417 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$440 | $417 | |
Intel Xeon E5 2620 v2 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,057 | $2,057 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs E5-2667V4 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||