Winner
Intel E5-2640V4
CPUBoss recommends the Intel E5-2640V4 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details Intel E5-2640V4 vs E5-2630V4 |
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2640V4
- 2.4 GHz
- Deca core
5.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-2640V4
 | Higher turbo clock speed 3.4 GHz | | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
| | Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,854 | | Better PassMark score 15,348 |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2630V4
- 2.2 GHz
- Deca core
5.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E5-2630V4
| | Slightly lower typical power consumption 69.06W | | Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 74.46 $/year |
| | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 20.48 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2640V4 vs E5-2630V4 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,854 | vs | 1,634 | Around 15% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 15,348 | vs | 13,999 | Around 10% better PassMark score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 4.64 pt/W | vs | 3.47 pt/W | Around 35% better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.06 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Slightly lower typical power consumption | 69.06W | vs | 73.13W | More than 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 74.46 $/year | vs | 78.84 $/year | More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 20.48 $/year | vs | 21.68 $/year | More than 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2640V4 vs E5-2630V4
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-2640V4 | vs | E5-2630V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Deca core | Deca core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 90W | 85W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 21.68 $/year | 20.48 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 78.84 $/year | 74.46 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 4.64 pt/W | 3.47 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 73.13W | 69.06W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,000 MHz | |
details | E5-2640V4 | vs | E5-2630V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 20 | 20 | |
| L3 cache | 25 MB | 25 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 76°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.39 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.06 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 2.39 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 1,572,864 MB | |
 Intel E5-2640V4  Report a correction |  Intel E5-2630V4 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $681 | $667 | |
| E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2630V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $417 | $667 | |
| E5-2620V4 vs E5-2630V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $390 | $667 | |
| E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2630V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $667 | |
| 6700K vs E5-2630V4 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,374 | $667 | |
| 2660 v2 vs E5-2630V4 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $1,000 | $939 | |
| E5-2640 v3 vs E5-2640V4 | ||
| | VS | |
| $417 | $939 | |
| E5-2620V4 vs E5-2640V4 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| N4200 vs 6100U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A6-9220 vs 6200U | ||
