0 Comments
| Intel E5-2628LV4 vs Core i7 2600K |
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2628LV4
- 1.9 GHz
- Duodeca core
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-2628LV4
![]() | Much more l3 cache 30 MB | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 60.94W | ![]() | Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB |
VS
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i7 2600K
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 2600K
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 30 MB | vs | 8 MB | 3.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 60.94W | vs | 114.2W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 48x more RAM | |||
More cores | 12 | vs | 4 | Three times as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 24 | vs | 8 | Three times as many threads | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2011 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 87 °C | vs | 72.6 °C | Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 18.07 $/year | vs | 41.8 $/year | 2.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 65.7 $/year | vs | 111.78 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 80% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 60% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required |
Features Key features of the E5-2628LV4 vs Core i7 2600K
clock speed
E5-2628LV4
1.9 GHz
Core i7 2600K
3.4 GHz
turbo clock speed
E5-2628LV4
2.4 GHz
Core i7 2600K
3.8 GHz
L3 cache
E5-2628LV4
30 MB
Core i7 2600K
8 MB
TDP
E5-2628LV4
75W
Core i7 2600K
95W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-2628LV4 | vs | Core i7 2600K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Cores | Duodeca core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 32,768 MB |
details | E5-2628LV4 | vs | Core i7 2600K |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 24 | 8 | |
L3 cache | 30 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 87°C | Unknown - 72.6°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 10.x | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 850 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,350 MHz | |
3DMark06 | N/A | 5,275 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 75W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 18.07 $/year | 41.8 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 65.7 $/year | 111.78 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 60.94W | 114.2W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | DMI | |
Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
Intel E5-2628LV4 ![]() | Intel Core i7 2600K ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $330 | |
Intel Core i7 3770K vs 2600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $330 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 2600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $330 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 2600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | $330 | |
Intel Core i5 3570K vs i7 2600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$220 | $330 | |
Intel Core i5 2500K vs i7 2600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $330 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs 2600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $330 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs 2600K | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||