0 Comments
| Intel E5-2620V4 vs E5-2609V4 |
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2620V4
- 2.1 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel E5-2620V4
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz | ![]() | More threads 16 |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.37 GHz | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.1 GHz | vs | 1.7 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many threads | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.37 GHz | vs | 1.7 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.7 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E5-2609V4 vs the E5-2620V4. | |||||||
Features Key features of the E5-2620V4 vs E5-2609V4
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E5-2620V4 | vs | E5-2609V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 85W | 85W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.48 $/year | 20.48 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 74.46 $/year | 74.46 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 69.06W | 69.06W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
details | E5-2620V4 | vs | E5-2609V4 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 8 | |
L3 cache | 20 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.37 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.58 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.37 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum memory size | 1,572,864 MB | 1,572,864 MB |
Intel E5-2620V4 ![]() | Intel E5-2609V4 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | $417 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$667 | $417 | |
Intel E5-2630V4 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$681 | $417 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$777 | $417 | |
Intel Xeon E5649 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,166 | $417 | |
Intel E5-2650V4 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$440 | $417 | |
Intel Xeon E5 2620 v2 vs E5-2620V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$313 | $310 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs E5-2609V4 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||