Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel E5-1620V4

Intel E5-1620V4

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel E5-2620V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-2620V4

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 69.06W vs 113.75W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
Better PassMark score 11,389 vs 10,062 Around 15% better PassMark score
Much lower annual home energy cost 20.48 $/year vs 33.73 $/year Around 40% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 74.46 $/year vs 122.64 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Higher Maximum operating temperature 74 °C vs 69 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel E5-1620V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-1620V4

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,117 vs 1,527 Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.59 GHz vs 2.37 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.78 GHz vs 2.58 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Apr, 2016 vs Jan, 2016 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of E5-2620V4 vs E5-1620V4

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E5-2620V4
11,389
E5-1620V4
10,062

PassMark (Single Core)

E5-2620V4
1,527
E5-1620V4
2,117

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E5-2620V4  vs
E5-1620V4 
Clock speed 2.1 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
AVX
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 85W 140W
Annual home energy cost 20.48 $/year 33.73 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 74.46 $/year 122.64 $/year
Performance per watt 2.54 pt/W 2.32 pt/W
Typical power consumption 69.06W 113.75W

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 2 0
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 0 MT/s

details

E5-2620V4  vs
E5-1620V4 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 16 8
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 74°C Unknown - 69°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.37 GHz 3.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz 3.78 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.37 GHz 3.59 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum memory size 1,572,864 MB 1,572,864 MB
Intel E5-2620V4
Report a correction
Intel E5-1620V4
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus