Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i7 4700EQ

Intel Core i7 4700EQ

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel E3950

Reasons to consider the
Intel E3950

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 9.75W vs 38.19W 3.9x lower typical power consumption
Higher GPU clock speed 500 MHz vs 400 MHz 25% higher GPU clock speed
Newer Oct, 2016 vs Apr, 2013 Release date over 3 years later
Better performance per watt 6.15 pt/W vs 4.04 pt/W More than 50% better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.89 $/year vs 11.32 $/year 3.9x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 10.51 $/year vs 41.17 $/year 3.9x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 4700EQ

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4700EQ

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,832 vs 709 More than 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 7,229 vs 2,034 More than 3.5x better PassMark score
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of E3950 vs Core i7 4700EQ

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E3950
3,964

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E3950
1,201

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E3950
972.3 MB/s
Core i7 4700EQ
3,160 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E3950
2,034

PassMark (Single Core)

E3950
709

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E3950  vs
Core i7 4700EQ 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB

details

E3950  vs
Core i7 4700EQ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 98°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 505 Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 500 MHz 400 MHz

power consumption

TDP 12W 47W
Annual home energy cost 2.89 $/year 11.32 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 10.51 $/year 41.17 $/year
Performance per watt 6.15 pt/W 4.04 pt/W
Typical power consumption 9.75W 38.19W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel E3950
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4700EQ
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus