Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core M3-6Y30

Intel Core M3-6Y30

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel E3950

Reasons to consider the
Intel E3950

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 0.9 GHz Around 80% higher clock speed
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 500 MHz vs 300 MHz More than 65% higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Oct, 2016 vs Jul, 2015 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Core M3-6Y30

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core M3-6Y30

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 30.69 pt/W vs 6.15 pt/W Around 5x better performance per watt
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 2,388.5 vs 1,201 Around 2x better geekbench 3 single core score
Lower typical power consumption 3.66W vs 9.75W 2.7x lower typical power consumption
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,647.5 vs 3,964 More than 15% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Lower annual home energy cost 1.08 $/year vs 2.89 $/year 2.7x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 3.94 $/year vs 10.51 $/year 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of E3950 vs Core M3-6Y30

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E3950
3,964
Core M3-6Y30
4,647.5

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E3950
1,201
Core M3-6Y30
2,388.5

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E3950
972.3 MB/s
Core M3-6Y30
3,015 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E3950
2,034
Core M3-6Y30
3,056

PassMark (Single Core)

E3950
709
Core M3-6Y30
1,183

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E3950  vs
Core M3-6Y30 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 0.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 16,384 MB

details

E3950  vs
Core M3-6Y30 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 505 Intel® HD Graphics 515
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 500 MHz 300 MHz

power consumption

TDP 12W 4.5W
Annual home energy cost 2.89 $/year 1.08 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 10.51 $/year 3.94 $/year
Performance per watt 6.15 pt/W 30.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 9.75W 3.66W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel E3950
Report a correction
Intel Core M3-6Y30
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus