Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel E3950

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel E3950

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel E3950

Reasons to consider the
Intel E3950

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Higher GPU clock speed 500 MHz vs 350 MHz Around 45% higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Oct, 2016 vs Jul, 2011 Release date over 5 years later
Significantly better performance per watt 6.15 pt/W vs 3.06 pt/W More than 2x better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Better PassMark score 2,034 vs 613 More than 3.2x better PassMark score
Slightly lower typical power consumption 9.75W vs 13.81W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 10.51 $/year vs 14.89 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.89 $/year vs 4.1 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron 827E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 827E

Report a correction
Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 98 °C Almost the same

Benchmarks Real world tests of E3950 vs Celeron 827E

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E3950
2,034

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E3950  vs
Celeron 827E 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 16,998.4 MB

details

E3950  vs
Celeron 827E 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 98°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 505 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 500 MHz 350 MHz

power consumption

TDP 12W 17W
Annual home energy cost 2.89 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 10.51 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 6.15 pt/W 3.06 pt/W
Typical power consumption 9.75W 13.81W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel E3950
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 827E
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus