Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel E3950

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel E3950

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel E3950

Reasons to consider the
Intel E3950

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,964 vs 2,624 More than 50% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Oct, 2016 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 3 years later
Front view of Intel Atom E3845

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3845

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 317,450 MB/s vs 972.3 MB/s Around 326.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher clock speed 1.91 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 11.4 pt/W vs 6.15 pt/W More than 85% better performance per watt
Higher Maximum operating temperature 110 °C vs 98 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Higher GPU clock speed 542 MHz vs 500 MHz Around 10% higher GPU clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of E3950 vs Atom E3845

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E3950
3,964
Atom E3845
2,624

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E3950
1,201

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E3950
972.3 MB/s
Atom E3845
317,450 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E3950
2,034
Atom E3845
1,466

PassMark (Single Core)

E3950
709

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E3950  vs
Atom E3845 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.91 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
EM64T
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

E3950  vs
Atom E3845 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 98°C -40 - 110°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 505 HD
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 500 MHz 542 MHz

power consumption

TDP 12W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.89 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 10.51 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 6.15 pt/W 11.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 9.75W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel E3950
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3845
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus