0 Comments
| Intel E3940 vs E3930 |
Released October, 2016
Intel E3940
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel E3940
![]() | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz | ![]() | Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,564 |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,086 |
VS
Released October, 2016
Intel E3930
- 1.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the E3930
![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 5.28W | ![]() | Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature 103 °C |
![]() | Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 5.69 $/year | ![]() | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 1.57 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.3 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 3,564 | vs | 1,531.5 | More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,086 | vs | 835 | More than 30% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Better performance per watt | 6.52 pt/W | vs | 5.48 pt/W | Around 20% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 5.28W | vs | 7.72W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature | 103 °C | vs | 100 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 5.69 $/year | vs | 8.32 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 1.57 $/year | vs | 2.29 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of E3940 vs E3930
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E3940 | vs | E3930 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.3 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | E3940 | vs | E3930 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 103°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 9.5W | 6.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.29 $/year | 1.57 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.32 $/year | 5.69 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6.52 pt/W | 5.48 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 7.72W | 5.28W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel E3940 ![]() | Intel E3930 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||