Intel E3940 vs E3930 |
Released October, 2016
Intel E3940
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel E3940
 | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz | | Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,564 |
| | More cores 4 | | Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,086 |
VS
Released October, 2016
Intel E3930
- 1.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the E3930
| | Slightly lower typical power consumption 5.28W | | Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature 103 °C |
| | Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 5.69 $/year | | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 1.57 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.3 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 3,564 | vs | 1,531.5 | More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,086 | vs | 835 | More than 30% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Better performance per watt | 6.52 pt/W | vs | 5.48 pt/W | Around 20% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
| Slightly lower typical power consumption | 5.28W | vs | 7.72W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature | 103 °C | vs | 100 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 5.69 $/year | vs | 8.32 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 1.57 $/year | vs | 2.29 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of E3940 vs E3930
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E3940 | vs | E3930 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
details | E3940 | vs | E3930 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 103°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 9.5W | 6.5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.29 $/year | 1.57 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.32 $/year | 5.69 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 6.52 pt/W | 5.48 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 7.72W | 5.28W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel E3940  Report a correction |  Intel E3930 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
