Intel E3930 vs Celeron 1047UE |
Released October, 2016
Intel E3930
- 1.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel E3930
 | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | More number of displays supported 3 |
| | Newer Oct, 2016 | | Lower typical power consumption 5.28W |
VS
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron 1047UE
- 1.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron 1047UE
| | Slightly higher clock speed 1.4 GHz | | Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2013 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 5.28W | vs | 13.81W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better performance per watt | 5.48 pt/W | vs | 3.14 pt/W | Around 75% better performance per watt | |||
| Higher GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | Around 15% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 1.57 $/year | vs | 4.1 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 5.69 $/year | vs | 14.89 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Slightly higher clock speed | 1.4 GHz | vs | 1.3 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature | 105 °C | vs | 103 °C | Almost the same | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the E3930 vs Celeron 1047UE
clock speed
gpu clock speed
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E3930 | vs | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 16,384 MB | |
details | E3930 | vs | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 103°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | 350 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6.5W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.57 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.69 $/year | 14.89 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 5.48 pt/W | 3.14 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 5.28W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel E3930  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 1047UE Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| Intel E3940 vs E3930 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | ||
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs E3930 | ||
 | VS | |
| $52 | ||
| Intel Atom E3845 vs E3930 | ||
 | VS | |
| Intel E3950 vs E3930 | ||
 | VS | |
| $34 | ||
| Intel Atom E3825 vs E3930 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| Intel Celeron 2980U vs E3930 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $31 | $130 | |
| Intel Atom E3815 vs Celeron 1047UE | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
