0 Comments
| Intel E3930 vs Atom E3805 |
Released October, 2016
Intel E3930
- 1.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel E3930
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Newer Oct, 2016 |
VS
Released October, 2014
Intel Atom E3805
- 1.33 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Atom E3805
![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 2.44W | ![]() | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 0.72 $/year |
![]() | Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 2.63 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Oct, 2016 | vs | Oct, 2014 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 2.44W | vs | 5.28W | 2.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 0.72 $/year | vs | 1.57 $/year | 2.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 2.63 $/year | vs | 5.69 $/year | 2.2x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the E3930 vs Atom E3805
clock speed
E3930
1.3 GHz
Atom E3805
1.33 GHz
TDP
E3930
6.5W
Atom E3805
3W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | E3930 | vs | Atom E3805 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Single Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | E3930 | vs | Atom E3805 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6.5W | 3W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.57 $/year | 0.72 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 5.69 $/year | 2.63 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 5.28W | 2.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel E3930 ![]() | Intel Atom E3805 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
J1900 vs E3930 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
E3940 vs E3930 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
N3350 vs E3930 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
E3950 vs E3930 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$52 | ||
E3845 vs E3930 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$37 | ||
E640T vs E3930 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$34 | ||
E3825 vs E3930 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||