Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel E3-1585V5

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel E3-1585V5

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel E3-1585V5

Reasons to consider the
Intel E3-1585V5

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,737 vs 513 Around 3.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 9,403 vs 3,162 Around 3x better PassMark score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Apr, 2016 vs Jul, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom C2758

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2758

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 16.25W vs 52.81W 3.2x lower typical power consumption
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.82 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 3.2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 3.3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of E3-1585V5 vs Atom C2758

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E3-1585V5
9,403
Atom C2758
3,162

PassMark (Single Core)

E3-1585V5
1,737

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

E3-1585V5  vs
Atom C2758 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Octa core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 65W 20W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 4.82 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 17.52 $/year
Performance per watt 4.45 pt/W 4.02 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 16.25W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 0 1

details

E3-1585V5  vs
Atom C2758 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.5 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® Iris™ Pro Graphics P580 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 65,536 MB
Intel E3-1585V5
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2758
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus