CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X9100 vs X9000

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Core2 X9100 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 X9100  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core2 X9100

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core2 X9100

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 X9100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 X9100

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.06 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Significantly better performance per dollar 1.99 pt/$ vs 0.72 pt/$ More than 2.8x better performance per dollar
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 3,007 vs 1,513 Around 2x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Marginally newer Jul, 2008 vs Jan, 2008 Release date 6 months later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.07 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core2 X9000

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 X9000

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the X9000 Extreme Edition vs the X9100 Extreme Edition.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 X9100 vs X9000

GeekBench (32-bit)

Core2 X9100
3,007
Core2 X9000
1,513

GeekBench

Core2 X9100
3,445
Core2 X9000
3,090

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Core2 X9100
2,810
Core2 X9000
2,549
With the system overclocked we were able to break 10,000 3DMarks in 3DMark 2006 and run faster than many of the desktops on the market today.
Core2 X9000 | by Legit Reviews (Jul, 2008)

Passmark

Core2 X9100
2,172
Core2 X9000
2,011
Results: Running Cinebench R10 in 32-bit mode shows how quick the Dell XPS M1730 notebook really is, especially when overclocked.
Core2 X9000 | by Legit Reviews (Jul, 2008)

Passmark (Single Core)

Core2 X9100
1,221
Core2 X9000
1,118
Default 3DMark06 settings were used for testing, so a resolution of 1280x1024 was used.
Core2 X9000 | by Legit Reviews (Jul, 2008)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 X9100  vs
X9000 
Clock speed 3.06 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
478
P
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,066 MHz 800 MHz

details

Core2 X9100  vs
X9000 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 6 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 45 nms
Transistor count 410,000,000 410,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 12 14
Voltage range 1.05 - 1.26V 1 - 1.28V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.62 GHz 3.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.07 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.62 GHz 3.57 GHz

power consumption

TDP 44W 44W
Annual home energy cost 10.6 $/year 10.6 $/year
Performance per watt 8.98 pt/W 8.17 pt/W
Typical power consumption 35.75W 35.75W
Intel Core2 X9100
Report a correction
Intel Core2 X9000
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus