Intel Core2 X9000 vs Duo T9300 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 X9000
- 2.8 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
0.6 Out of 10
by Legit Reviews (Jul, 2008)Legit Bottom Line: The Intel Core 2 Duo Extreme Mobile X9000 processor is by far the best all around gaming/enthusiast processor I have ever seen.
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X9000 vs T9300 among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 X9000 vs the Core2 Duo T9300. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T9300 vs the Core2 X9000. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 X9000 vs Duo T9300
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 X9000 | vs | Duo T9300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 478 | |||
| P | |||
| 479 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 44W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 10.6 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.76 pt/W | 2.74 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 35.75W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | |
details | Core2 X9000 | vs | Duo T9300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 14 | 12 | |
| Voltage range | 1 - 1.27V | 1 - 1.25V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.57 GHz | 2.69 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.57 GHz | 2.69 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Core2 X9000  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo T9300 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 71 € | 80 € | |
| T9300 vs T9500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 71 € | 19 € | |
| T9300 vs T8300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 71 € | 76 € | |
| T9300 vs 3110M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 71 € | 243 € | |
| T9300 vs T7500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 71 € | 371 € | |
| T9300 vs T7700 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 71 € | 241 € | |
| T9300 vs P8400 | ||
 | VS | |
| 446 € | 80 € | |
| X9000 vs T9500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 573 € | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A10-9600P | ||
| | VS |  |
| 573 € | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 326 € | 418 € | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 363 € | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS | |
| 369 € | 363 € | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 5200U vs 7410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 573 € | ||
| 6200U vs 7200U | ||
