Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Solo U2100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Solo U2100

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Solo U2100 vs the Core2 Duo P8400.

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo P8400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo P8400

Report a correction
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Solo U2100 vs Duo P8400

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Solo U2100  vs
Duo P8400 
Clock speed 1.06 GHz 2.26 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
479
P

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 25W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 6.02 $/year
Performance per watt 2.25 pt/W 3.83 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.47W 20.31W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 533 MHz 1,066 MHz

details

Core2 Solo U2100  vs
Duo P8400 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 291,000,000 410,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 8
Voltage range 0.8 - 1V 1.05 - 1.15V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.07 GHz 2.54 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.07 GHz 2.26 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.07 GHz 2.54 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Core2 Solo U2100
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Duo P8400
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus