Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Solo U2100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Solo U2100

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Solo U2100 vs the Core i3 3110M.

Front view of Intel Core i3 3110M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3110M

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Solo U2100 vs Core i3 3110M

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Solo U2100  vs
Core i3 3110M 
Clock speed 1.06 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
479
rPGA 988B

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 2.25 pt/W 3.71 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.47W 28.44W

details

Core2 Solo U2100  vs
Core i3 3110M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 24

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.07 GHz 2.43 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.07 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.07 GHz 2.43 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,000 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Solo U2100
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 3110M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus