0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Solo U2100 vs Atom N270 |
Released September, 2007
Intel Core2 Solo U2100
- 1.06 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Solo U2100
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom N270 vs the Core2 Solo U2100. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Solo U2100 vs Atom N270
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Solo U2100
427
Atom N270
491
GeekBench
Core2 Solo U2100
427
Atom N270
854
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Solo U2100
303
Atom N270
271
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Solo U2100 | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
437 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 5.5W | 2.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.32 $/year | 0.6 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.25 pt/W | 9.71 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.47W | 2.03W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
details | Core2 Solo U2100 | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 47,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 12 | |
Voltage range | 0.8 - 1V | 0.9 - 1.16V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.07 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.07 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.07 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Solo U2100 ![]() | Intel Atom N270 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N450 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N455 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N2600 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $32 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$40 | $32 | |
Intel Atom Z520 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $32 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | ||
Intel Atom N280 vs N270 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||