Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Solo SU3500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Solo SU3500

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 4.47W vs 13.81W 3.1x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 3.1x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 4.82 $/year vs 14.89 $/year 3.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core2 Solo SL3400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Solo SL3400

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.86 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Core2 Solo SU3500  vs SL3400 

clock speed

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Solo SU3500  vs
SL3400 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Single core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 17W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 4.82 $/year 14.89 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.47W 13.81W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 1,066 MHz

details

Core2 Solo SU3500  vs
SL3400 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
L2 cache 3 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 410,000,000 410,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.05 - 1.15V 1.05 - 1.15V

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Core2 Solo SU3500
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Solo SL3400
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus