Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Solo SU3300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Solo SU3300

Report a correction
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Solo SU3300 vs Celeron 847

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Solo SU3300  vs
Celeron 847 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.1 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 956
BGA 1023

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 17W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 4.1 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.47W 13.81W

details

Core2 Solo SU3300  vs
Celeron 847 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 6 11

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.33 GHz 1.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.33 GHz 1.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 800 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Solo SU3300
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus