Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Solo SU3300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Solo SU3300

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Core2 Solo SU3300 vs the AMD C 70.

Front view of AMD C 70

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 70

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Solo SU3300 vs AMD C 70

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Solo SU3300  vs
AMD C 70 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core2 Solo SU3300  vs
AMD C 70 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 6 5

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7290
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 276 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 400 MHz

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 9W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 2.17 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.47W 7.31W
Intel Core2 Solo SU3300
Report a correction
AMD C 70
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus