0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 vs Q6600 |
Released August, 2008
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650
- 3 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Quad Q9650
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Q6600 vs the Q9650. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q9650 vs Q6600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9650
5,792
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,490
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9650
1,692
Core2 Quad Q6600
1,306
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9650
128,200 MB/s
Core2 Quad Q6600
102,800 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9650
5,442
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,161
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9650
5,901
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,541
GeekBench
Core2 Quad Q9650
7,010
Core2 Quad Q6600
5,918
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Quad Q9650
4,222
Core2 Quad Q6600
2,970
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Quad Q9650
1,267
Core2 Quad Q6600
924
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q9650 | vs | Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 105W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.47 pt/W | 1.19 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 85.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Core2 Quad Q9650 | vs | Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 71.4°C | Unknown - 62.2°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.15 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.25 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.15 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 ![]() | Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Q6600 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs Q8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs Q8200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Q6600 vs Q9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | ||
Q6600 vs 3570K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$339 | $969 | |
Q9650 vs E5450 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||