0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9550S vs Q9400S |
Released January, 2009
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550S
- 2.83 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Quad Q9550S
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.83 GHz | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.83 GHz |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.83 GHz |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.83 GHz | vs | 2.66 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.83 GHz | vs | 2.67 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.83 GHz | vs | 2.67 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Q9400S vs the Q9550S. | |||||||
Features Key features of the Core2 Quad Q9550S vs Q9400S
clock speed
Core2 Quad Q9550S
2.83 GHz
Core2 Quad Q9400S
2.66 GHz
L2 cache
Core2 Quad Q9550S
12 MB
Core2 Quad Q9400S
6 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Core2 Quad Q9550S
2.83 GHz
Core2 Quad Q9400S
2.67 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Core2 Quad Q9550S
2.83 GHz
Core2 Quad Q9400S
2.67 GHz
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q9550S | vs | Q9400S |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Core2 Quad Q9550S | vs | Q9400S |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 456,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 8 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 76.3°C | Unknown - 76.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2.67 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.83 GHz | 2.67 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.83 GHz | 2.67 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550S ![]() | Intel Core2 Quad Q9400S ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$340 | $287 | |
Q9550S vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$340 | $285 | |
Q9550S vs E8600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$340 | $339 | |
Q9550S vs Q9650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$340 | $100 | |
Q9550S vs 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$340 | $179 | |
Q9550S vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$254 | $200 | |
Q9400S vs Q9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$254 | $72 | |
Q9400S vs J1800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||