0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Q9400 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Q9550 vs the Q9400. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Q9400 vs the Q9550. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Q9400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
5,498
Core2 Quad Q9400
5,123
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
1,604
Core2 Quad Q9400
1,490
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
121,500 MB/s
Core2 Quad Q9400
114,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
5,132
Core2 Quad Q9400
4,796
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
5,686
Core2 Quad Q9400
4,951
GeekBench
Core2 Quad Q9550
7,065
Core2 Quad Q9400
6,513
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Quad Q9550
4,002
Core2 Quad Q9400
3,379
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Quad Q9550
1,199
Core2 Quad Q9400
1,130
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q9550 | vs | Q9400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.51 pt/W | 1.51 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Core2 Quad Q9550 | vs | Q9400 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 456,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 8 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 71.4°C | Unknown - 71.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 127 | 34 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.99 GHz | 3.54 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.03 GHz | 4.15 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.99 GHz | 3.54 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 ![]() | Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Q9400 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $179 | |
Q9400 vs Q8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $179 | |
Q9400 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
Q9550 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $125 | |
Q9550 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $339 | |
Q9550 vs Q9650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $220 | |
Q9550 vs 2500K | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||