0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Q9300 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Q9550 vs the Q9300 Extreme Edition. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Q9300 Extreme Edition vs the Q9550. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Q9300
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
5,498
Core2 Quad Q9300
4,773
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
1,604
Core2 Quad Q9300
1,390
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
121,500 MB/s
Core2 Quad Q9300
107,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
5,132
Core2 Quad Q9300
4,476
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
5,686
Core2 Quad Q9300
4,885
GeekBench
Core2 Quad Q9550
7,065
Core2 Quad Q9300
5,823
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Quad Q9550
4,002
Core2 Quad Q9300
3,535
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Quad Q9550
1,199
Core2 Quad Q9300
1,048
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q9550 | vs | Q9300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.51 pt/W | 1.44 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Core2 Quad Q9550 | vs | Q9300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 456,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 7 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 71.4°C | Unknown - 71.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.99 GHz | 3.38 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.03 GHz | 3.61 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.99 GHz | 3.38 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 ![]() | Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
Q6600 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$339 | $287 | |
Q9650 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $287 | |
E8400 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $287 | |
3220 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$220 | $287 | |
2500K vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $287 | |
Q9400 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Q6600 vs Q9300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||