Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Q9300 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Q9550 vs the Q9300 Extreme Edition. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Q9300 Extreme Edition vs the Q9550. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Q9300
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q9550 | vs | Q9300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.51 pt/W | 1.44 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,333 MHz | |
details | Core2 Quad Q9550 | vs | Q9300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 456,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 8 | 7 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 71.4°C | Unknown - 71.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.99 GHz | 3.38 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.03 GHz | 3.61 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.99 GHz | 3.38 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Core2 Quad Q9550  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $339 | $287 | |
| Q9650 vs Q9550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $287 | ||
| Q6600 vs Q9550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $287 | |
| 3220 vs Q9550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | $287 | |
| E8400 vs Q9550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $735 | $287 | |
| E5440 vs Q9550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $220 | $287 | |
| 2500K vs Q9550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $183 | $287 | |
| Q9500 vs Q9550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $74 | $67 | |
| 925 vs E2140 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
