0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs QX9770 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550
- 2.83 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Quad Q9550
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 QX9770 vs the Core2 Quad Q9550. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q9550 vs QX9770
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
5,498
Core2 QX9770
6,063
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
1,604
Core2 QX9770
1,736
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9550
121,500 MB/s
Core2 QX9770
137,050 MB/s
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
Core2 Quad Q9550
3,570
Core2 QX9770
4,320
Cinebench R11.5
Core2 Quad Q9550
3.47
Core2 QX9770
3.87
Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)
Core2 Quad Q9550
0.88
Core2 QX9770
0.98
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
Core2 Quad Q9550
12,335
Core2 QX9770
14,116
sysmark 2007 (overall)
Core2 Quad Q9550
199
Core2 QX9770
222
Reviews Word on the street
Core2 Quad Q9550 | vs | QX9770 | ||
![]() | 9.0 | 8.0 |
---|
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q9550 | vs | QX9770 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 136W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 32.76 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 119.14 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.51 pt/W | 1.32 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 110.5W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,600 MHz |
details | Core2 Quad Q9550 | vs | QX9770 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 820,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 8 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 71.4°C | Unknown - 55.5°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.99 GHz | 4.23 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.03 GHz | 4.47 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.99 GHz | 4.23 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 ![]() | Intel Core2 QX9770 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
Q9550 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $339 | |
Q9550 vs Q9650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $125 | |
Q9550 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $179 | |
Q9550 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $220 | |
Q9550 vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $183 | |
Q9550 vs Q9500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $735 | |
Q9550 vs E5440 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||