0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 vs Duo E6700 |
Released January, 2010
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500
- 2.83 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Quad Q9500
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | More threads 4 | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.83 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
- 2.66 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Duo E6700
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.83 GHz | vs | 2.66 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 71.4 °C | vs | 60.1 °C | Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.4 GHz | vs | 3.35 GHz | Almost the same | |||
Newer | Jan, 2010 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.83 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q9500 vs Duo E6700
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9500
5,402
Core2 Duo E6700
2,556
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9500
1,562
Core2 Duo E6700
1,390
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9500
120,400 MB/s
Core2 Duo E6700
113,800 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9500
5,228
Core2 Duo E6700
2,396
GeekBench
Core2 Quad Q9500
5,228
Core2 Duo E6700
3,863
x264 HD 4.0
Core2 Quad Q9500
48.15 fps
Core2 Duo E6700
28.48 fps
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Quad Q9500
3,629
Core2 Duo E6700
1,703
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Quad Q9500
1,199
Core2 Duo E6700
995
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q9500 | vs | Duo E6700 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.6 pt/W | 1.69 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 52.81W |
details | Core2 Quad Q9500 | vs | Duo E6700 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 456,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 71.4°C | Unknown - 60.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.35 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.83 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.4 GHz | 3.35 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E6700 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$183 | $287 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$183 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$183 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 vs Q8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$183 | $200 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 vs Q9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$183 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 vs Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$183 | $234 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 vs Q9505 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs Pentium E6700 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||