0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 vs Core i3 3220 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Quad Q9300
![]() | Much more l2 cache 6 MB | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core | ![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
VS
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 3220
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 44.69W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 71.4 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.61 GHz | vs | 3.46 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 77.19W | More than 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2008 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 3.38 GHz | Almost the same |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q9300 vs Core i3 3220
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9300
4,773
Core i3 3220
5,399
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9300
1,390
Core i3 3220
2,501
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9300
107,000 MB/s
Core i3 3220
173,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9300
4,476
Core i3 3220
5,351
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9300
4,885
Core i3 3220
5,707
GeekBench
Core2 Quad Q9300
5,823
Core i3 3220
8,919
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Quad Q9300
3,535
Core i3 3220
4,229
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Quad Q9300
1,048
Core i3 3220
1,764
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q9300 | vs | Core i3 3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 55W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 13.25 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 48.18 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.44 pt/W | 2.69 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 44.69W |
details | Core2 Quad Q9300 | vs | Core i3 3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 7 | 33 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 71.4°C | Unknown - 65.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.38 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.61 GHz | 3.46 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.38 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,050 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 ![]() | Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$94 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium J2900 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $125 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
AMD E1 2500 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $125 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||