0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 vs Duo T9900 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Quad Q9000 vs the Core2 Duo T9900. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T9900 vs the Core2 Quad Q9000. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q9000 vs Duo T9900
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9000
3,507
Core2 Duo T9900
2,984
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9000
1,121
Core2 Duo T9900
1,657
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9000
86,600 MB/s
Core2 Duo T9900
125,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9000
3,297
Core2 Duo T9900
2,787
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q9000
5,285
Core2 Duo T9900
3,154
GeekBench
Core2 Quad Q9000
5,285
Core2 Duo T9900
4,139
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Quad Q9000
2,531
Core2 Duo T9900
2,149
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Quad Q9000
841
Core2 Duo T9900
1,186
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q9000 | vs | Duo T9900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.06 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
P | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.16 pt/W | 3.66 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Core2 Quad Q9000 | vs | Duo T9900 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 7 | 11 | |
Voltage range | 1.05 - 1.18V | 1.05 - 1.21V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.34 GHz | 3.38 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 3.07 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.34 GHz | 3.38 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T9900 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$851 | ||
X9100 vs T9900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$316 | ||
T9600 vs T9900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$851 | ||
Q9100 vs T9900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
P9700 vs T9900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
T4400 vs T9900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,038 | ||
QX9300 vs T9900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | ||
P8600 vs T9900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||