0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 vs Q6600 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Q8400 vs the Q6600. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Q6600 vs the Q8400. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q8400 vs Q6600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q8400
5,035
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,490
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q8400
1,465
Core2 Quad Q6600
1,306
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q8400
113,900 MB/s
Core2 Quad Q6600
102,800 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q8400
4,623
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,161
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Quad Q8400
5,191
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,541
GeekBench
Core2 Quad Q8400
6,816
Core2 Quad Q6600
5,918
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Quad Q8400
3,197
Core2 Quad Q6600
2,970
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Quad Q8400
1,126
Core2 Quad Q6600
924
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q8400 | vs | Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 105W | |
Annual home energy cost | 51.39 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 130.79 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.94 pt/W | 1.19 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 135.97W | 85.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Core2 Quad Q8400 | vs | Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 456,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 71.4°C | Unknown - 62.2°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 29 | 278 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.48 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.91 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.48 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 ![]() | Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Q6600 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs Q8200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Q6600 vs Q9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | ||
Q6600 vs 3570K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
Q6600 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $179 | |
Q8400 vs E8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||