CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Q8200 vs 2100 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Quad Q8200  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Quad Q8200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Core i3 2100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2100

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 2.33 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q8200 vs Core i3 2100

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Quad Q8200
100,000 MB/s
Core i3 2100
153,100 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Reviews Word on the street

Core2 Quad Q8200  vs Core i3 2100 

7.6
9.3
Great for HTPC, Games and a bit of Media Encoding, it's a jack of all trades and definitely worth a look for the non enthusiast on a budget.
Core i3 2100

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Quad Q8200  vs
Core i3 2100 
Clock speed 2.33 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 65W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 37.88 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 93.47 $/year
Performance per watt 1.19 pt/W 1.41 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 98.28W

details

Core2 Quad Q8200  vs
Core i3 2100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 4 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 7 31
Operating temperature Unknown - 71.4°C Unknown - 69.1°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 30 101
Overclock review score 3 4.5
Overclocked clock speed 3.07 GHz 3.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz 3.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.07 GHz 3.23 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 2100
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus