0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Duo E8190 |
Released January, 2007
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More threads 4 |
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz |
VS
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8190
- 2.66 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Duo E8190
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.66 GHz |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.67 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.66 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 85.31W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.4 °C | vs | 62.2 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.89 GHz | vs | 3.52 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | Around 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Jan, 2008 | vs | Jan, 2007 | Release date over a year later |
Features Key features of the Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Duo E8190
clock speed
Core2 Quad Q6600
2.4 GHz
Core2 Duo E8190
2.66 GHz
L2 cache
Core2 Quad Q6600
8 MB
Core2 Duo E8190
6 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Core2 Quad Q6600
3.52 GHz
Core2 Duo E8190
3.89 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Core2 Quad Q6600
3.6 GHz
Core2 Duo E8190
2.67 GHz
TDP
Core2 Quad Q6600
105W
Core2 Duo E8190
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q6600 | vs | Duo E8190 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 105W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Core2 Quad Q6600 | vs | Duo E8190 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 582,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 8 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 62.2°C | Unknown - 72.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.52 GHz | 3.89 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | 2.67 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.52 GHz | 3.89 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E8190 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | ||
Intel Core i5 3570K vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Q6600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||