Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 85.31W vs 92.5W Around 10% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year vs 35.3 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i3 530

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 530

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly higher clock speed 2.93 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.31 GHz vs 3.52 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C vs 62.2 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jan, 2010 vs Jan, 2007 Release date over 3 years later
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 88.48 $/year vs 91.98 $/year Around 5% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i3 530

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Quad Q6600
102,800 MB/s
Core i3 530
123,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Quad Q6600  vs
Core i3 530 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.93 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1156

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 105W 73W
Annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year 35.3 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year 88.48 $/year
Performance per watt 1.19 pt/W 1.21 pt/W
Typical power consumption 85.31W 92.5W

details

Core2 Quad Q6600  vs
Core i3 530 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 582,000,000 382,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 22
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.5V 0.65 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 62.2°C Unknown - 72.6°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 278 13
Overclocked clock speed 3.52 GHz 4.31 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz 4.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.52 GHz 4.31 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 733 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 530
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus