CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Q6600 vs J1900 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron J1900 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron J1900  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 102,800 MB/s vs 56,900 MB/s More than 80% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.52 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,490 vs 2,927 Around 55% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz vs 2.42 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 85.31W 10.5x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jan, 2007 Release date over 6 years later
Significantly better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 1.19 pt/W More than 3.5x better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 25.29 $/year 10.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 91.98 $/year 10.5x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Celeron J1900

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Quad Q6600
102,800 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Quad Q6600  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 854 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core2 Quad Q6600  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 8 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.52 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.52 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 105W 10W
Annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 1.19 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 85.31W 8.13W
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus