0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Atom S1240 |
Released January, 2007
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
![]() | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.52 GHz |
VS
Released December, 2012
Intel Atom S1240
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Atom S1240
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 4.96W |
![]() | Newer Dec, 2012 | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 1.47 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.52 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 4.96W | vs | 85.31W | 17.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Dec, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2007 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 1.47 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | 17.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 5.34 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | 17.2x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Atom S1240
clock speed
Core2 Quad Q6600
2.4 GHz
Atom S1240
1.6 GHz
L2 cache
Core2 Quad Q6600
8 MB
Atom S1240
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Core2 Quad Q6600
3.52 GHz
Atom S1240
1.6 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Core2 Quad Q6600
3.6 GHz
Atom S1240
1.6 GHz
TDP
Core2 Quad Q6600
105W
Atom S1240
6.1W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Quad Q6600 | vs | Atom S1240 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 105W | 6.1W | |
Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 1.47 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 5.34 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 4.96W |
details | Core2 Quad Q6600 | vs | Atom S1240 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.52 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.52 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 ![]() | Intel Atom S1240 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | ||
Intel Core i5 3570K vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||