Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 0.5 MB 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.92 GHz 25% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 2600+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 2600+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP 2600+ vs the Intel Core2 Quad Q6600.

Features Key features of the Core2 Quad Q6600  vs Athlon XP 2600+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Quad Q6600  vs
Athlon XP 2600+ 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.92 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Core2 Quad Q6600  vs
Athlon XP 2600+ 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 8 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 85.31W N/A

bus

Clock speed 1,066 MHz 333 MHz
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 2600+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus